The Schools Trust: the Homestead
Act of 1862 and Public Education in Alaska
© 2003 by Niilo
Koponen
Much can be heard recently about funding
cuts in the public school system in Alaska as the state budget is being
negotiatied between the governor and the Legislature. Niilo Koponen, former
member of the Alaska House of Representatives, provides a little historical
overview to the debate, and suggests an alternative source of funding.
Under the Morrill Act, the Homestead Act of 1862,
Congress set aside Sections 16 and 36 of every township of federal land
granted to states and territories. This was to provide income (rents, leases,
salesóat market value) with the money going into a trust to provide school
funding. In territorial days the Legislature set up a "Permanent School
Fund" with the income from those sales and property leases. The same was
done for the university and for the Mental Health Trust (one section out
of every township). These were congressionally mandated funds.
Much of these landsóespecially in Anchorageówere
leased by entrepreneurs at far below market value and subleased to stores,
hospitals (Alaska Regional, formerly the Teamsterís Hospital) and all sorts
of ventures. After statehood, agencies such as DOT took over the land without
paying, arguing that it belonged to the state, so why pay. The Anchorage
situation resulted in a lawsuit wherein the decisionówritten by former
Chief Justice Jay Rabinowitzódecided that the property leased or sold must
be paid for at full market value and that the money must go for public
education as directed by Congress.
The Anchorage establishment blew its cork and started
a campaign to "put the property on the tax rolls." In 1977 and í78 the
Legislature, pushed by Representative Ralph Meekins, Jr., (who in the 1981
session took over the Speakerís chair, thus sparking the "coup" which led
to a Republican-led Legislature for more than a decade), reclassified the
School, University, and Mental Health Trust lands as general state public
lands. It also allowed municipalities to take ownership of 10% of state
public lands within municipal boundaries.
Anchorage did so (as did other municipalities) and
passed an ordinance "selling" the parcels to the original lessor (not the
sublessor who may have built the structure on it!) for the equivalent of
two years under the market value rent! The properties were not offered
at auction or to any other purchasers! The property did go on the Anchorage
tax rolls, but the property taxes were not set aside for school, university,
or mental health purposes, but were used for whatever purpose the borough
assembly wantedósuch as the Convention Center, etc.
The result in other communities was that state agencies
such as DOT, Corrections, and Health and Social Services appropriated the
lands, often before the municipalities acted to appropriate their full
share. When municipalities did so, they often took the lands for establishing
or expanding needed municipal functions, although outlying areas often
were made available to private development.
The loss of income from the Mental Health Trust lands
led to immediate lawsuits against the state. The University of Alaska first
sued to reclaim the lands that the state had specifically transferred from
the federally mandated University Land Trust. On February 27, 1981 the
Alaska Supreme Court found in favor of the university. Later the university
sued for compensation or lands of equal value for other trust lands taken
by the stateóincluding university lands given to municipalities. The university
also won this suit.
The Mental Health lawsuit was also won and led to
considerable political conflict in the Legislature over which agency should
be compensated. The Mental Health Trust was established and eventually
given lands and funds to create a mental health system statewide. However,
since the original congressional actóthe Alaska Mental Health Enabling
Act, passed in 1956ógranted one million acres to be held in public trust
to help create and operate mental health facilities throughout Alaska,
it was felt that this implied regionalization, rather than centralized
operation. This led to controversy among the supporters of the Mental Health
Trust. The State of Alaska lost both that lawsuit and a less onerous one
by the university system. Several school districts considered suing, but,
afraid of political repercussions, decided against it.
The initial legislation creating the territory of
Alaska did not include any provision for public education; Congress apparently
assumed that the U.S. Office of Education would provide what was needed.
Large, stable mining and fishing communities, having taxing powers, took
it upon themselves to open schools for children of local families. In the
next decade, Judge Wickersham, as Alaskaís delegate to Congress, got Congress
to amend the Territorial Act to give the responsibility to the Alaska Legislature
to oversee the creation and support of public schools; further, Wickersham
got federal lands surveyed in settled parts of Alaska and extended the
Morrill Act provisions for the funding of public schools from sections
16 and 36 in such surveyed areas as the Tanana Valley (surveyed 1910-1916)
and throughout the "Railbelt" slightly later.
Following World War II the influx of population into
the Territory created a stressful boom in school attendance. Dr. James
Ryan, former head of the teacher education department at the University
of Alaska, who had been appointed Commissioner of Education by Governor
Ernest Gruening, created the Permanent School Fund with the income from
the Morrill Act School Lands. He further lobbied Congress, which created
a two-cent-per-package cigarette tax, which went to the Permanent School
Fund.
The School Fund still exists, but is far from adequate
and local property taxes support a large share of school costs. In territorial
days, the territory (and tobacco taxes) paid the largest portion of school
costs. Local "Independent School Districts" could tax themselves and did
so to improve school quality and for locally needed programs. The state
constitution (and federal court decisions in other states) places the responsibility
for public education directly on the state. In fact, Alaskaís constitution
fixes the responsibility on the Legislatureówith restrictions, stating:
"The Legislature shall by general law establish and maintain a system of
public schools open to all children of the state, and may provide for other
public educational institutions. Schools and institutions so established
shall be free from sectarian control. No money shall be paid from public
funds for the direct benefit of any religious or other private educational
institution." (Article VII, Section 1). We should consider fully funding
the school fund by reconstituting the public school land trust as has been
done for the Mental Health Trust and/or giving the public school fundóas
a trustóincome equal to the income from two sections of every township
(including oil, mineral, gravel, and timber lands) of state landsóincluding
reimbursement for the funds lost since the legislative action in 1978 before
some parents, property owners, or interested folks file a lawsuit that
will make the Mental Health suit look like a nickel and dime affair. This
would largely alleviate the burden on municipal property taxpayers and
help solve the problem of funding schools in unorganized areas (those without
municipal or borough infrastructure). In a case in the Lower 48 the U.S.
Supreme Court ruled that the state could delegate, but not abrogate its
responsibilities for public education. Alaskaís own constitution is even
more specific, fixing the responsibility squarely on the Legislature.
The proposal currently mooted by the Administration,
to use the Permanent Fund to supplement the School Fund, is yet another
raid similar to the Legislatureís 1975 theft of Mental Health Lands. Historically,
Congress intended that the income be provided from land income: be it agricultural,
commercial, industrial, or mineralóincluding oil. The University of Texas
endowment, probably the largest of any public university, is based on the
profits of the oil lands that U.T. owns and leases out. Why didnít we do
that with Prudhoe Bay for the public schools of Alaska, urban, rural, or
suburban? Local taxes will never be sufficient. Children are not born only
in wealthy communities (and even in those communities, adults often find
other things they want to spend public monies on!). Read Article VII Section
One of the Alaska State Constitution again. It is part of the constitutional
job description of members of the Alaska Legislature. |